H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 Adelaide International round of 32 1-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #13 1-6 7-6 6-3 Tina Mochizuki Match data Dec 1, 1988* R32 Adelaide International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.