Louise Field
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Louise Field vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-1
Louise Field holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Louise Field leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 128 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data | Mar 13, 1993* | R128 | Key Biscayne | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Donna Faber | 6-3 6-2 | Louise Field | Match data | Feb 8, 1992* | QF | Wellington | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Louise Field | 7-6 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data | Jun 14, 1989* | R64 | Birmingham | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Louise Field | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Louise Field | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1480 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.62 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 |
| 20 | 1987 | 1453 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +36 | +129 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.84 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 |
| 21 | 1988 | 1413 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +55 | +117 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.10 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 1435 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -98 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 1449 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.42 | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |