H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Louise Field vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-1
Louise Field holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Louise Field leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1993 Key Biscayne first round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Louise Field | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1992* | Wellington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-3 6-2 | Louise Field | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1989* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Louise Field | 7-6 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |