Louise Field
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1989 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | 6-3 6-4 | Judith Wiesner | Match data | Aug 23, 1989* | R64 | Canadian Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,976 | 303 | 179 | 62.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Louise Field | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1989 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 25 | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 27 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| Career | — | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | 106 | 64 | 170 | 62.4% | 131 | 72 | 203 | 64.5% | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 41 | 30 | 71 | 57.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Louise Field | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 1480 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.62 | 1985 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 20 | 1987 | 1453 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +36 | +129 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.84 | 1986 | 1514 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +64 | — | 53.3% | +0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.77 |
| 21 | 1988 | 1413 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +55 | +117 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.10 | 1987 | 1696 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +11 | -79 | 57.1% | +0.56 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.5 | +2.26 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.30 | 1988 | 1754 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -139 | +74 | — | 53.7% | +0.41 | 10–7 (59%) | 4–1 (80%) | 106.3 | -0.01 |
| 23 | 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 | 1989 | 1736 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +91 | -114 | 61.0% | +0.74 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.4 | +3.28 |
| 24 | 1991 | 1435 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -98 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 | 1990 | 1846 | 152.4 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +17 | -141 | 64.7% | +1.10 | 9–6 (60%) | 10–5 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.74 |
| 25 | 1992 | 1449 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 | 1991 | 1963 | 155.9 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -50 | -187 | 61.1% | +0.73 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.4 | -2.10 |
| 26 | 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 | 1992 | 1912 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +17 | -128 | 57.7% | +0.49 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.2 | -0.07 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 | 1993 | 1906 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +50 | — | 60.4% | +0.67 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.1 | -1.43 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1894 | 149.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +42 | — | 63.5% | +0.95 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.6 | +0.38 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1915 | 149.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -25 | -156 | 61.8% | +1.24 | 11–7 (61%) | 2–9 (18%) | 92.9 | -1.06 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1923 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -98 | -7 | 59.8% | +0.61 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | -2.40 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1826 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -4 | +98 | 61.8% | +0.87 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 95.1 | +0.60 |
| Career | — | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.42 | — | 1976 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +18 | -79 | 60.2% | +0.76 | 84–63 (57%) | 50–36 (58%) | 106.1 | -0.13 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 11 | 11 | Oct 5, 1996 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 9, 1997 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6 | 2 | 8 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 7 | 8 | Nov 18, 1996 | H2H |