H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Louise Field vs Kathrin Keil H2H: 1-1
Louise Field and Kathrin Keil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1989 Taipei third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Louise Field | 6-4 7-6 | Kathrin Keil | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1987* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kathrin Keil | 6-3 6-2 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |