H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Louise Field vs Kristine Kunce H2H: 1-0
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Kristine Kunce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1992 Wellington fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1992* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Louise Field | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Kristine Kunce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristine Kunce | #572 | #45 | 205 | 1,765 | 46 | 63 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Kristine Kunce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #168 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #56 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #221 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #121 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |