H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Louise Field vs Mana Endo H2H: 1-1
Louise Field and Mana Endo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1992 Taipei fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Louise Field | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Mana Endo | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mana Endo | 7-6 6-0 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mana Endo | #381 | #26 | 413 | 1,819 | 77 | 79 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Mana Endo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |