Louise Field
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1989 Canadian Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | 6-4 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Aug 24, 1989* | R32 | Canadian Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Louise Field | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Louise Field | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1990 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | Career | 125 | 129 | 254 | 49.2% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 33 | 33 | 66 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Louise Field | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 1983 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1984 | 1478 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 | 1985 | 1542 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.89 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 1986 | 1480 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.62 | 1986 | 1683 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +1.30 |
| 1987 | 1453 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +36 | +129 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.84 | 1987 | 1659 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | -85 | 41.9% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.83 |
| 1988 | 1413 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +55 | +117 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.10 | 1988 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | -37 | 37.3% | -1.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -1.05 |
| 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.30 | 1989 | 1592 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.25 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +2.41 |
| 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 | 1990 | 1746 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -257 | — | 51.7% | +0.10 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.1 | -0.70 |
| 1991 | 1435 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -98 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 | 1991 | 1740 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -243 | -169 | 48.9% | -0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.3 | +0.98 |
| 1992 | 1449 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 | 1992 | 1697 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -146 | 48.5% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.1 | +0.32 |
| 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 | 1993 | 1749 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -270 | -150 | 51.6% | +0.31 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.6 | -0.37 |
| 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 | 1994 | 1773 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -260 | -181 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1788 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -292 | — | 54.1% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +0.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1666 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -192 | — | 31.6% | -1.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1673 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| Career | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.42 | Career | 1850 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -251 | -124 | 47.3% | -0.20 | 63–57 (53%) | 39–25 (61%) | 108.6 | +0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |