H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Louise Field vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1989 Toronto third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Louise Field | 6-4 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Louise Field | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |