H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Louise Field vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 0-1
Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1993 Hong Kong third round 7-5 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1993* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |