H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Louise Field vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1992 Taipei quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Louise Field
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #192 6-2 7-5 Louise Field #156 Match data Sep 30, 1992* QF Taipei Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Louise Field #752 #96 12 1,550 58 121 32.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Louise Field Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 0–1 0.0% #248 1,485 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,517 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1986 4–10 28.6% #157 1,479 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1987 11–17 39.3% #113 1,453 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1988 4–13 23.5% #163 1,412 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1989 12–20 37.5% #100 1,542 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1990 9–17 34.6% #125 1,522 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1991 3–14 17.6% #193 1,435 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1992 5–9 35.7% #170 1,449 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1993 5–10 33.3% #175 1,470 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1994 1–3 25.0% #197 1,477 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Louise Field Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1989 8 13 21 38.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1993 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 61 92 33.7% 7 26 33 21.2% 17 24 41 41.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Louise Field Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1985 1518 115.3 — — — — — — +108 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.31 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1986 1480 96.1 — — — — +51 +34 — 26.7% -1.53 2–0 0–2 — +1.62 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1987 1453 103.6 — — — — +25 +36 +129 40.6% -0.91 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.5 +2.84 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1988 1413 105.2 — — — — +8 +55 +117 30.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 97.9 +1.10 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1989 1543 115.0 — — — — -45 -110 +60 38.9% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.30 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1990 1523 107.8 — — — — -25 -143 +110 41.9% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 1–1 — +1.49 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1991 1435 97.6 — — — — +9 -98 — 21.6% -1.87 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 94.3 +0.83 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1992 1449 98.4 — — — — +48 — — 38.9% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 +1.27 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1993 1471 105.2 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.04 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1994 1477 88.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 0–1 — -0.23 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1551 106.4 — — — — +1 -13 +105 35.6% -1.07 22–33 (40%) 19–24 (44%) 96.1 +5.42 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.