Louise Field
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1991 Wellington round of 16 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | 6-4 6-3 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data | Feb 8, 1991* | R16 | Wellington | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,756 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Louise Field | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 18 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 22 | 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | 37 | 51 | 88 | 42.0% | 63 | 66 | 129 | 48.8% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Louise Field | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1986 | 1511 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +66 | +21 | — | 42.1% | -0.32 | 1–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +1.63 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 | 1987 | 1570 | 115.5 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +23 | -24 | 41.5% | -0.68 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.79 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1480 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.62 | 1988 | 1623 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -71 | +18 | -77 | 43.1% | -0.81 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.0 | -1.73 |
| 20 | 1987 | 1453 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +36 | +129 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.84 | 1989 | 1651 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | -107 | +48 | — | 46.4% | -0.36 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | 104.4 | +0.43 |
| 21 | 1988 | 1413 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +55 | +117 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.10 | 1990 | 1707 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -62 | +51 | — | 55.1% | +0.37 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.71 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.30 | 1991 | 1581 | 115.5 | — | — | — | — | -35 | +106 | -2 | 37.1% | -0.81 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–7 (42%) | 96.0 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 | 1992 | 1707 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | -116 | +108 | — | 54.0% | +0.51 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.8 | +0.07 |
| 24 | 1991 | 1435 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -98 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 | 1993 | 1612 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | -42 | +134 | — | 38.8% | -0.58 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.7 | +0.32 |
| 25 | 1992 | 1449 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 | 1994 | 1631 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +60 | — | 48.2% | -0.11 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.2 | +0.74 |
| 26 | 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 | 1995 | 1617 | 117.8 | — | — | — | — | -12 | +72 | — | 38.9% | -0.95 | 2–0 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.10 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 | 1996 | 1574 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1601 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +34 | -44 | 32.4% | -1.59 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1556 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +4 | — | 24.0% | -2.32 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.45 |
| Career | — | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.42 | — | 1756 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +58 | -41 | 43.1% | -0.53 | 42–40 (51%) | 26–33 (44%) | 100.9 | +0.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 27, 1994 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 9, 1991 | H2H |