H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Louise Stacey vs Stacey Martin H2H: 0-1

Stacey Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Stacey in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stacey Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacey Martin won the 1992 Wellington round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Louise Stacey
AUS Age 54
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Stacey Martin
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stacey Martin 6-3 3-6 6-4 Louise Stacey Match data Feb 6, 1992* R32 Wellington Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Louise Stacey — — — 1,500 0 5 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacey Martin — — — 1,677 37 59 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Louise Stacey Stacey Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
17 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 1988 6–6 50.0% — 1,560 0 0
18 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1989 10–13 43.5% — 1,613 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1990 11–18 37.9% — 1,575 0 0
20 1992 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,552 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% — 1,528 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,515 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Louise Stacey Stacey Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25 36 61 41.0% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Louise Stacey Stacey Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1491 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
17 1989 1497 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.19 1988 1561 115.3 — — — — +34 — — 48.0% -0.28 1–0 0–1 — +0.49
18 1990 1480 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.26 1989 1613 127.6 — — — — +14 -79 — 45.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — -0.27
19 1991 1473 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.04 1990 1575 118.2 — — — — -3 -19 — 42.6% -0.47 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.9 +0.10
20 1992 1456 96.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.03 1991 1552 114.5 — — — — -11 +2 — 38.3% -0.83 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.7 +0.49
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1528 91.6 — — — — -2 +13 — 21.4% -2.36 1–1 — — +0.30
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1516 98.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.04
Career — 1500 99.9 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — +1.20 — 1678 119.8 — — — — +6 -21 — 41.1% -0.68 12–16 (43%) 3–9 (25%) 94.6 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.