H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2013 Bogota third round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |