H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 1-1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino and María Emilia Salerni are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2007 Bad Gastein fourth round 0-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2007* | Bad Gastein | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | María Emilia Salerni | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2002* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | María Emilia Salerni | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |