H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2006 Budapest semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #45 6-3 6-4 Michaella Krajicek #36 Match data Jul 29, 2006* SF Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Michaella Krajicek #1,134 #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,670 0 3
19 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,536 0 3
20 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,536 0 3
21 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,506 0 3
22 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,589 0 3
23 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,562 0 3
24 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,545 0 3
26 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1671 133.9 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -36 +109 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.19
19 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2008 1536 99.3 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +17 -23 +207 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 +0.74
20 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 2009 1536 114.7 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +22 — +168 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.19
21 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2010 1507 96.3 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +30 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 2011 1589 120.2 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +35 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +1.00
23 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2012 1562 112.0 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +61 -54 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.19
24 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23 2013 1536 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +55 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.28
25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29 2015 1549 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87 2017 1529 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18 2024 1502 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46 — 1803 124.4 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -84 +80 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.