H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lubomira Bacheva vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 0-1
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Lubomira Bacheva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Lubomira Bacheva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lubomira Bacheva | #1,157 | #68 | 445 | 1,523 | 27 | 56 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lubomira Bacheva | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #73 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #158 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |