H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Lubomira Kurhajcova vs Rita Grande H2H: 1-2
Rita Grande holds a 2–1 lead over Lubomira Kurhajcova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 2–0 on clay, while Lubomira Kurhajcova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2004 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-3 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2004* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rita Grande | 6-3 1-6 6-0 | Lubomira Kurhajcova | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2003* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lubomira Kurhajcova | 6-3 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2003* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rita Grande | 6-2 6-0 | Lubomira Kurhajcova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lubomira Kurhajcova | #769 | #59 | 566 | 1,615 | 27 | 43 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lubomira Kurhajcova | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #262 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |