H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lucie Hradecka vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 2–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2012 US Open first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2010* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-4 7-5 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| May 21, 2010* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |