H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Ayumi Morita H2H: 1-0

Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Ayumi Morita in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2009 Strasbourg Open semifinal 6-0 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ayumi Morita
Japan Age 36 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Hradecka #84 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Ayumi Morita #73 Match data May 23, 2009* SF Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ayumi Morita #1,117 #40 1,345 1,700 83 127 39.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ayumi Morita
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #318 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–1 66.7% #180 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 6–6 50.0% #138 1,580 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #86 1,593 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 10–21 32.3% #83 1,509 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #73 1,491 0 0
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2011 20–25 44.4% #49 1,581 0 0
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2012 9–20 31.0% #85 1,539 0 0
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2013 18–21 46.2% #60 1,572 0 0
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 2014 3–4 42.9% #248 1,573 0 0
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ayumi Morita
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 5 10 15 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 15 18 33 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 5 15 20 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 14 14 28 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — 57 86 143 39.9% 18 26 44 40.9% 8 15 23 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 194/209 of Ayumi Morita's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ayumi Morita
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.7 3.7 67.9% 62.8% 50.9% 47.3% 65.1% 58.9% 45.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 11/12 0.5 3.4 59.4% 56.3% 47.5% 39.8% 47.6% 52.8% 40.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/17 0.4 2.3 61.8% 54.5% 44.0% 46.0% 45.0% 50.0% 43.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 28/31 0.9 2.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.1% 46.5% 49.0% 51.7% 41.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 25/26 1.3 1.7 68.1% 58.6% 46.8% 47.8% 47.3% 54.6% 41.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 41/45 0.7 1.9 67.7% 57.3% 46.1% 50.7% 50.8% 54.0% 43.4%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 26/29 0.5 1.5 61.4% 57.6% 46.3% 48.3% 47.0% 52.8% 41.2%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% 2013 39/39 1.1 1.7 63.4% 59.4% 43.3% 47.2% 47.5% 53.3% 40.1%
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% 2014 7/7 1.7 2.1 63.3% 50.7% 47.6% 43.2% 56.7% 49.7% 38.0%
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0% — 194/210 0.9 2.0 64.4% 57.4% 45.3% 47.4% 48.7% 53.0% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ayumi Morita
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1494 104.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1519 102.2 +1.30 +0.12 1.096 52.3% — — +115 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1581 112.6 -1.21 -2.90 0.853 46.9% -27 — +79 48.1% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.87
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1594 118.1 -3.04 +0.17 0.867 47.0% -4 -65 — 38.5% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.99
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1509 112.7 -2.81 -2.13 0.851 46.5% +27 +15 — 40.3% -0.48 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +1.33
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 104.6 -1.00 -2.22 0.913 47.8% +2 -13 +95 40.4% -0.56 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.31
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 2011 1581 128.3 -1.15 -0.28 0.944 48.8% +6 -49 -35 48.5% -0.26 7–10 (41%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 +1.00
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2012 1539 121.0 -2.33 -2.09 0.874 47.0% -19 +36 +28 40.4% -0.65 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.05
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2013 1572 122.1 -1.70 -2.81 0.859 46.8% +14 +20 -125 48.8% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.02
24 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41 2014 1573 103.7 -2.70 -1.82 0.755 44.4% +11 — — 46.2% -1.38 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.21
25 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 2017 1558 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1701 122.1 -1.80 -1.71 0.884 47.4% +4 -6 +32 44.4% -0.56 26–34 (43%) 16–16 (50%) 99.6 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.