H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-0

Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2009 Luxembourg round of 32 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Hradecka #69 7-6(4) 6-2 Catalina Castano #201 Match data Oct 22, 2009* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,702 83 110 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,507 0 0
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,496 0 0
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,469 0 0
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,499 0 0
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,510 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 13 18 27.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 26 45 71 36.6% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% 2007 22/30 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0% — 80/193 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 2007 1508 109.0 -1.79 -1.74 0.883 47.1% -38 +186 — 34.8% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.34
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 2008 1496 111.9 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% -7 +104 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.03
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 2009 1469 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 2010 1500 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +86 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.58
31 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 2011 1514 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +93 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.45
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 2012 1511 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1489 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.12
34 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1702 117.4 -1.56 -1.33 0.901 47.8% -38 +97 -90 44.4% -0.42 32–39 (45%) 21–21 (50%) 96.8 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.