H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 1-1

Lucie Hradecka and Karolina Sprem are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay, while Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2010 Memphis round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karolina Sprem #87 6-4 6-4 Lucie Hradecka #65 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Memphis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Hradecka #56 6-2 4-6 6-4 Karolina Sprem #115 Match data Jul 17, 2009* R16 Prague International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Karolina Sprem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Karolina Sprem
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 82/196 of Karolina Sprem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Karolina Sprem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/20 2.5 6.0 49.5% 62.9% 34.7% 46.4% 27.5% 48.7% 35.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 7/55 3.0 6.0 53.9% 63.7% 41.1% 57.9% 39.2% 53.4% 40.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/38 1.0 4.9 42.9% 51.0% 42.0% 28.6% 37.0% 46.0% 47.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/28 3.3 5.5 52.7% 63.5% 46.6% 60.8% 57.7% 55.2% 43.4%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 7/9 2.4 6.0 50.3% 65.9% 41.1% 64.4% 45.9% 53.6% 40.1%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% 2008 12/14 3.9 4.6 54.4% 68.0% 47.0% 58.2% 44.7% 58.6% 45.0%
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% 2009 10/11 3.9 6.2 53.2% 66.7% 44.2% 44.0% 40.1% 56.3% 38.6%
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% 2010 19/20 4.6 4.8 51.2% 70.9% 48.0% 46.1% 35.3% 59.7% 39.9%
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% 2011 1/1 8.0 11.0 54.1% 67.9% 31.1% 66.7% 45.5% 51.0% 42.7%
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0% — 82/197 3.5 5.4 51.7% 65.4% 44.9% 52.0% 43.2% 55.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Karolina Sprem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1483 93.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% — +85 — 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 — 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% — +130 — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% — +63 — 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54
24 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 — 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) — — -0.09
25 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13
26 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.