Lucie Hradecka
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2009 Prague quarterfinal 7-5 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data | Jul 18, 2009* | QF | Prague | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,725 | 92 | 121 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,846 | 133 | 140 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #26 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #166 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | 2012 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 29 | 16 | 45 | 64.4% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | 2013 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | 2014 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 30 | 2015 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2010 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2016 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | 2017 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 70 | 112 | 37.5% | 49 | 43 | 92 | 53.3% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | — | 94 | 97 | 191 | 49.2% | 30 | 32 | 62 | 48.4% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 2008 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 51.8% | 71.1% | 42.3% | 56.1% | 51.6% | 57.2% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 24/25 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 53.4% | 71.1% | 49.0% | 48.0% | 44.0% | 60.8% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 22/22 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 50.2% | 68.4% | 45.5% | 49.2% | 38.3% | 56.1% | 38.8% | 2005 | 1/12 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 56.3% | 52.4% | 44.9% | 46.2% | 35.3% | 49.1% | 46.3% |
| 26 | 2011 | 35/36 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 52.3% | 71.6% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 47.7% | 58.6% | 41.1% | 2006 | 22/45 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 66.6% | 57.9% | 46.9% | 47.3% | 52.4% | 53.5% | 39.8% |
| 27 | 2012 | 35/35 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 53.4% | 73.2% | 46.3% | 54.8% | 44.6% | 60.8% | 38.8% | 2007 | 56/67 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 66.4% | 63.7% | 52.1% | 57.0% | 52.8% | 60.1% | 47.2% |
| 28 | 2013 | 10/16 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 55.8% | 65.2% | 37.7% | 52.7% | 36.8% | 52.7% | 35.5% | 2008 | 37/52 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 66.9% | 57.4% | 47.7% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 53.8% | 45.0% |
| 29 | 2014 | 6/6 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 52.3% | 77.4% | 42.9% | 66.9% | 37.6% | 61.1% | 41.0% | 2009 | 39/44 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 68.8% | 58.1% | 45.5% | 54.4% | 46.5% | 54.3% | 44.1% |
| 30 | 2015 | 29/34 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 56.8% | 71.5% | 49.2% | 49.7% | 47.5% | 61.6% | 39.5% | 2010 | 31/34 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.9% | 58.1% | 42.5% | 49.1% | 51.1% | 53.7% | 43.5% |
| 31 | 2016 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 49.6% | 69.1% | 44.0% | 48.8% | 38.7% | 56.2% | 39.4% | 2011 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 64.1% | 53.4% | 42.9% | 45.9% | 45.2% | 49.6% | 41.0% |
| 32 | 2017 | 7/7 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 53.8% | 73.2% | 46.9% | 48.6% | 38.1% | 61.0% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 54.2% | 79.5% | 36.4% | 57.1% | 40.0% | 59.7% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 55.6% | 60.0% | 55.6% | 61.1% | 53.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 193/213 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 53.1% | 71.1% | 45.8% | 52.2% | 43.6% | 59.1% | 40.0% | — | 198/273 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 67.2% | 59.2% | 47.3% | 52.4% | 49.8% | 55.3% | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1487 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.01 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1491 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 1476 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 1522 | 116.1 | +0.28 | -0.38 | 1.043 | 51.8% | — | +57 | — | 60.0% | +1.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | 2003 | 1474 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1600 | 113.4 | +2.94 | -1.31 | 1.096 | 52.0% | -63 | +42 | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.1 | +1.41 | 2004 | 1441 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1499 | 111.9 | -0.60 | -4.41 | 0.885 | 47.5% | -50 | +122 | — | 31.9% | -0.96 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.3 | -0.10 | 2005 | 1492 | 115.8 | -0.71 | -0.20 | 0.911 | 47.7% | +24 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.15 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.5 | +0.20 |
| 26 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.7 | +2.75 | -1.69 | 0.993 | 49.9% | -48 | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.0 | -0.58 | 2006 | 1568 | 125.9 | -2.07 | -2.76 | 0.856 | 47.0% | -26 | -35 | +78 | 45.1% | -0.47 | 6–10 (38%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | -0.24 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1653 | 123.3 | +3.46 | -3.66 | 0.991 | 49.7% | -39 | +6 | — | 51.3% | -0.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.15 | 2007 | 1781 | 148.6 | +3.74 | +2.99 | 1.182 | 53.4% | -39 | -64 | -97 | 63.8% | +1.01 | 6–11 (35%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.6 | +1.23 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1562 | 108.1 | -2.03 | -4.06 | 0.752 | 44.2% | -32 | +96 | — | 36.1% | -0.94 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.1 | +0.39 | 2008 | 1718 | 130.0 | -1.29 | +1.00 | 0.973 | 49.3% | +25 | -53 | -79 | 51.2% | -0.20 | 10–11 (48%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.6 | +4.02 |
| 29 | 2014 | 1587 | 119.5 | +2.19 | +0.06 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -26 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.33 | 2009 | 1672 | 130.3 | -0.57 | +0.29 | 0.966 | 49.1% | +6 | +36 | -62 | 49.5% | -0.11 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.8 | +0.49 |
| 30 | 2015 | 1642 | 127.6 | +3.16 | -1.64 | 1.028 | 50.2% | -66 | +87 | -139 | 46.3% | -0.26 | 9–3 (75%) | 2–4 (33%) | 105.6 | -2.33 | 2010 | 1649 | 124.3 | -1.43 | -0.06 | 0.939 | 48.6% | +29 | -16 | -63 | 43.6% | -0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.7 | -0.29 |
| 31 | 2016 | 1580 | 113.8 | -0.39 | -1.79 | 0.900 | 47.8% | -16 | +88 | — | 32.5% | -0.90 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -0.40 | 2011 | 1570 | 105.8 | -3.05 | -1.68 | 0.813 | 45.3% | +74 | +18 | — | 27.6% | -1.59 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | -0.29 |
| 32 | 2017 | 1620 | 113.7 | +2.37 | -0.32 | 1.008 | 50.4% | -16 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1616 | 101.7 | +2.29 | +2.10 | 0.828 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 1597 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1550 | 93.8 | +0.91 | +0.06 | 1.371 | 57.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1726 | 122.6 | +1.93 | -2.27 | 0.977 | 49.5% | -43 | +67 | -139 | 45.1% | -0.27 | 27–36 (43%) | 26–33 (44%) | 99.1 | -1.07 | — | 1846 | 135.5 | +0.06 | +0.67 | 0.994 | 49.8% | +1 | -21 | -54 | 50.0% | -0.07 | 39–51 (43%) | 25–27 (48%) | 97.1 | +1.83 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 9 | 10 | Mar 4, 2011 | H2H |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 14, 2010 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 2, 2010 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 13, 2010 | H2H |