H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 0-1

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2010 Barcelona round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #56 6-4 7-5 Lucie Hradecka #73 Match data Apr 15, 2010* R32 Barcelona International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka — #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,475 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,600 0 0 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,653 0 0 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,562 0 0 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.3% 43.7% 59.1% 40.0% — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2009 1600 113.6 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -62 +43 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +1.39 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2010 1500 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -51 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.09 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2011 1582 128.8 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +50 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.60 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -31 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 2015 1643 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -67 +86 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40
31 2016 1580 114.5 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +89 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97
34 2019 1616 101.8 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
35 2020 1598 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.9 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.