H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2014 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 13, 2014* Quebec City WTA 250 QF Hard Venus Williams #19 6-3 4-6 7-6(3) Lucie Hradecka #181 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,726 92 120 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,498 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,580 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,653 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,562 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,641 0 0 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2016 5–13 27.8% #166 1,586 0 0 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,621 0 0 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47