H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2005 Auckland fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 7, 2005* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-3 6-1 Lucie Safarova #216 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8