H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Aravane Rezai H2H: 1-3
Aravane Rezai holds a 3–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Aravane Rezai leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2010 Bastad semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2010* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-3 6-3 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| May 15, 2010* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| May 3, 2007* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Aravane Rezai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |