H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-1

Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catalina Castano #139 6-1 6-4 Lucie Safarova #23 Match data Jan 16, 2008* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova — #5 4,055 1,931 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Catalina Castano — #35 623 1,702 85 111 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,780 0 3 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,519 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,793 0 5 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5 2007 12–21 36.4% #112 1,520 0 0
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,504 0 0
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,699 0 7 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,476 0 0
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,505 0 0
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,515 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 7 14 21 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% — 28 46 74 37.8% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's and 80/174 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Safarova Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0% 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7% 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7% 2007 22/33 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1% 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9% 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8% 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4% 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
Career — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0% — 80/196 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2007 1780 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -66 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.98 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 2009 1773 144.0 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +19 -74 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -108 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.45 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2011 1800 143.3 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +14 -5 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.95 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2012 1750 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +127 -150 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2013 1793 132.0 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 2014 1861 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -26 -11 -145 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02 2007 1520 113.0 -1.65 -1.56 0.883 47.1% -28 +175 — 37.0% -1.11 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.81
28 2015 1831 150.8 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -24 +70 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85 2008 1504 112.0 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% +4 +96 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.08
29 2016 1699 127.6 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +209 +26 47.9% -0.01 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56 2009 1477 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 2017 1798 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +17 +46 -1 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.87 2010 1505 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +82 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.55
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01 2011 1519 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +89 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1515 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1493 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.13
37 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 145.8 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 — 1702 118.0 -1.52 -1.28 0.901 47.8% -34 +95 -90 44.6% -0.41 33–39 (46%) 21–21 (50%) 97.4 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.