H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Dinara Safina H2H: 3-2

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–2 lead over Dinara Safina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 2–0 on clay, while Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 4, 2011* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #35 6-3 4-6 6-3 Dinara Safina #113 Match data
May 15, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Dinara Safina #1 6-0 4-6 6-3 Lucie Safarova #50 Match data
May 11, 2007* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Dinara Safina #10 3-6 6-3 6-2 Lucie Safarova #30 Match data
Jan 7, 2006* Gold Coast WTA 500 SF Hard Lucie Safarova #47 6-4 6-2 Dinara Safina #20 Match data
Jun 13, 2005 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Lucie Safarova #80 6-4 6-4 Dinara Safina #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Dinara Safina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 — — — — — — —