H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 6-2

Lucie Safarova holds a 6–2 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2016 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lucie Safarova #15 6-3 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #91 Match data
Jan 9, 2014* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #27 6-4 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #41 Match data
Mar 8, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #28 6-2 0-0 (ret.) Francesca Schiavone #12 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #32 6-3 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #8 Match data
Feb 12, 2010* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Lucie Safarova #46 7-5 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #18 Match data
Apr 18, 2009* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Francesca Schiavone #44 6-3 7-5 Lucie Safarova #49 Match data
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Francesca Schiavone #20 6-4 7-5 Lucie Safarova #44 Match data
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #70 6-3 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8