H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-2
Jelena Dokic holds a 2–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur final 2-6 7-6(9) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 2-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2011* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Jelena Dokic | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| May 25, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |