H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-0

Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2011 Italian Open round of 64 7-5 6-2.

Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Safarova #32 7-5 6-2 Kimiko Date #59 Match data May 11, 2011* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0%
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 1989 1563 118.2 -9 +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.20
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 1990 1665 128.2 -15 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) -0.03
20 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99 1991 1725 132.7 -22 -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 1992 1854 155.6 +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72
22 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 1993 1948 158.1 +75 -344 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46 1994 1985 161.2 +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33
24 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94 1995 2030 160.2 +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22
25 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 1996 2077 165.2 +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42
26 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73
27 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02
28 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85
29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56
30 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01
37 2024 1732 98.6 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% 0.0% -4.00 -0.05
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 -0.10
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.05
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% 0.0% -6.00 -0.16
Career 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.