H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 2-0

Lucie Safarova holds a 2–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2013 Paris third round 2-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2013* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Lucie Safarova #18 2-6 6-1 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #49 Match data
May 5, 2007* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Lucie Safarova #30 7-5 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2