H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 3-2

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–2 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michaella Krajicek leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2011 Copenhagen fourth round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 2011* Copenhagen WTA 250 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #38 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Michaella Krajicek #163 Match data
Apr 5, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Lucie Safarova #34 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 Michaella Krajicek #55 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Michaella Krajicek #56 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #31 Match data
Oct 28, 2005* Hasselt WTA 500 R16 Hard Michaella Krajicek #68 6-4 3-6 6-3 Lucie Safarova #55 Match data
Apr 29, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #155 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Michaella Krajicek #120 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Michaella Krajicek #1,134 #30 918 1,803 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2003 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,652 0 1
17 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,754 0 3
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,671 0 3
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,536 0 3
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,536 0 3
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,505 0 3
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,589 0 3
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,562 0 3
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,545 0 3
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7