H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Mona Barthel H2H: 3-1
Lucie Safarova holds a 3–1 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2015 Indian Wells second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 7-6(4) | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2014* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-3 6-3 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-3 6-4 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 6-1 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 |