H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 2-3

Nicole Vaidisova holds a 3–2 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2007 Paris fourth round 6-4 6-2.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2007* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Lucie Safarova #32 6-4 6-2 Nicole Vaidisova #9 Match data
Jan 25, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nicole Vaidisova #12 6-1 6-4 Lucie Safarova #70 Match data
Aug 17, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nicole Vaidisova #9 3-6 7-5 6-1 Lucie Safarova #38 Match data
Apr 7, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #34 6-1 4-6 6-4 Nicole Vaidisova #14 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nicole Vaidisova #35 4-6 6-0 6-4 Lucie Safarova #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Nicole Vaidisova #832 #7 1,981 1,997 155 84 64.9% 0 0 0 3 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Nicole Vaidisova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,674 0 2
16 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5
17 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,916 0 6
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,946 0 6
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2008 17–18 48.6% #41 1,711 0 6
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,578 0 6
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,579 0 6
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,566 0 6
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7