H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 2-2

Lucie Safarova and Patty Schnyder are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2011 Miami second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #31 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #41 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Schnyder #20 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) Lucie Safarova #48 Match data
Mar 25, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Patty Schnyder #18 4-6 6-1 6-4 Lucie Safarova #48 Match data
Jan 7, 2006* Gold Coast WTA 500 QF Hard Lucie Safarova #47 6-4 6-3 Patty Schnyder #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11