H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 1-3

Sybille Bammer holds a 3–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2009 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Safarova #60 6-3 6-1 Sybille Bammer #27 Match data Jan 21, 2009* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Sybille Bammer #32 7-5 6-4 Lucie Safarova #82 Match data Aug 15, 2008* R16 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard
Sybille Bammer #22 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 Lucie Safarova #26 Match data Jun 22, 2007* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Sybille Bammer #46 6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 Lucie Safarova #37 Match data Aug 2, 2006* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's and 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Safarova Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7% 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1% 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9% 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8% 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4% 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
Career — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0% — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17
24 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03
25 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23
28 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02
29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49
30 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
37 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.