H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-1

Lucie Safarova holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 Seoul third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 28, 2006* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #72 7-5 6-4 Lucie Safarova #40 Match data
Jun 13, 2005 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Lucie Safarova #80 6-1 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #87 Match data
Apr 28, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 R32 Clay Lucie Safarova #155 7-5 6-7(3) 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3