H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-1

Lucie Safarova holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 Korea Open round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #72 7-5 6-4 Lucie Safarova #40 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Safarova #80 6-1 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #87 Match data Jun 17, 2005* R16 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lucie Safarova #155 7-5 6-7(3) 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #64 Match data Apr 28, 2005* R32 Estoril Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's and 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9% 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7%
30 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8% 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0%
31 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4% 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3%
Career — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0% — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47
25 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
37 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.