H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Zuzana Ondraskova H2H: 1-0
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Zuzana Ondraskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lucie Safarova | 7-5 6-2 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Zuzana Ondraskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |