H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 2-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 2–0 lead over Amelie Cocheteux in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ludmila Cervanova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2000 Berlin second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-1 6-1 | Amelie Cocheteux | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1999* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 7-5 6-0 | Amelie Cocheteux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amelie Cocheteux | #365 | #55 | 552 | 1,596 | 28 | 53 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Amelie Cocheteux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #64 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #180 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |