H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Antonella Serra Zanetti H2H: 1-1
Ludmila Cervanova and Antonella Serra Zanetti are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2003 Budapest fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-1 6-1 | Antonella Serra Zanetti | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2003* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Antonella Serra Zanetti | 6-4 6-2 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonella Serra Zanetti | #963 | #60 | 536 | 1,578 | 49 | 92 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Antonella Serra Zanetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #92 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #111 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #100 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #322 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |