H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 1-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2004 Estoril third round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |