H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-2
Florencia Labat holds a 2–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 6-3 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1999* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 7-5 6-3 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |