H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 2-1
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 2–1 lead over Henrieta Nagyova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ludmila Cervanova leads 2–0 on clay, while Henrieta Nagyova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henrieta Nagyova won the 2003 Pattaya third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2003* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-2 7-6(5) | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2003* | Helsinki | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | (w/o) | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2003* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |