H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Janette Husarova H2H: 0-3
Janette Husarova holds a 3–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janette Husarova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janette Husarova won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janette Husarova | 6-3 6-4 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Janette Husarova | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Janette Husarova | 6-2 6-4 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Janette Husarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |