H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ludmila Cervanova vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-0

Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2002 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ludmila Cervanova
SVK Age 46 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ludmila Cervanova #112 6-4 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #69 Match data May 29, 2002* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ludmila Cervanova #889 #58 578 1,685 76 96 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1998 1–1 50.0% #135 1,508 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1999 5–9 35.7% #102 1,529 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2000 3–8 27.3% #122 1,490 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2001 11–16 40.7% #92 1,532 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2002 11–15 42.3% #103 1,541 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2003 20–14 58.8% #64 1,634 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2004 15–17 46.9% #96 1,625 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2005 7–15 31.8% #119 1,485 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2006 3–1 75.0% #325 1,531 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2004 1 6 7 14.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2006 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 10 30 40 25.0% 60 54 114 52.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1998 1509 99.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.01 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 1999 1529 121.2 — — — — — +52 — 36.4% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.02 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2000 1491 104.0 — — — — +16 +49 — 33.3% -1.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.44 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2001 1532 117.2 — — — — -10 -4 +111 42.4% -0.42 6–6 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 +0.10 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2002 1542 113.5 — — — — -69 +67 — 44.6% -0.39 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.38 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2003 1634 117.8 -0.30 -1.04 0.974 49.8% -172 +107 -6 55.4% +0.24 5–3 (63%) 3–4 (43%) 102.5 +0.84 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2004 1626 110.3 -1.96 -2.43 0.757 44.1% -197 +83 -3 46.6% -0.70 5–4 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 104.2 -0.61 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2005 1485 107.8 -1.61 -0.97 0.841 46.2% -65 +131 +29 38.9% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.73 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2006 1531 105.8 — — — — — +134 — 60.0% +0.10 2–0 2–0 — +0.15 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1685 116.9 -1.35 -1.63 0.841 46.4% -86 +78 +33 44.9% -0.46 27–27 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.7 +0.60 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.