H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Magui Serna H2H: 1-3
Magui Serna holds a 3–1 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magui Serna leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2003 Palermo fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2003* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-3 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-3 6-3 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2002* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-3 6-2 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2002* | Oporto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Magui Serna | 7-5 6-1 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Magui Serna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |