H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 3-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 3–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ludmila Cervanova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2006 Bogota fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ludmila Cervanova | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2002* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-0 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |