H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian H2H: 1-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2002 Oporto fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 42
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002* | Oporto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-3 6-3 | Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian | #1,258 | #33 | 934 | 1,771 | 53 | 58 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #74 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #65 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #332 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |