H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ludmila Cervanova vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-0

Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2001 Bratislava round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ludmila Cervanova
SVK Age 46 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ludmila Cervanova #115 6-4 6-3 Meilen Tu #49 Match data Oct 19, 2001* R16 Bratislava Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ludmila Cervanova #889 #58 578 1,685 76 96 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1998 1–1 50.0% #135 1,508 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1999 5–9 35.7% #102 1,529 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0
20 2000 3–8 27.3% #122 1,490 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 2001 11–16 40.7% #92 1,532 0 0 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0
22 2002 11–15 42.3% #103 1,541 0 0 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2003 20–14 58.8% #64 1,634 0 0 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2004 15–17 46.9% #96 1,625 0 0 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2005 7–15 31.8% #119 1,485 0 0 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2006 3–1 75.0% #325 1,531 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Meilen Tu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2004 1 6 7 14.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 10 30 40 25.0% 60 54 114 52.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 16/88 of Ludmila Cervanova's and 58/96 of Meilen Tu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Meilen Tu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 5/34 0.8 4.4 67.3% 59.1% 49.5% 52.8% 55.7% 56.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 7/32 0.7 2.3 65.7% 56.6% 39.2% 55.2% 32.2% 50.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 4/22 1.8 4.5 58.3% 60.8% 36.9% 53.3% 27.3% 50.1% 42.0% 2003 1/18 0.0 7.0 63.2% 53.5% 44.0% 36.4% 28.6% 50.0% 48.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/13 1.0 3.0 65.7% 52.1% 48.2% 55.9% 41.7% 50.6% 36.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/16 0.6 4.2 64.7% 58.3% 44.3% 43.8% 43.2% 53.3% 41.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 38/42 1.0 5.3 65.8% 62.7% 42.6% 55.8% 49.7% 55.8% 45.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 4/7 0.5 4.3 71.0% 55.8% 43.7% 52.5% 59.4% 52.2% 39.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Meilen Tu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04
18 1998 1509 99.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.01 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25
19 1999 1529 121.2 — — — — — +52 — 36.4% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.02 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01
20 2000 1491 104.0 — — — — +16 +49 — 33.3% -1.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.44 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08
21 2001 1532 117.2 — — — — -10 -4 +111 42.4% -0.42 6–6 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 +0.10 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21
22 2002 1542 113.5 — — — — -69 +67 — 44.6% -0.39 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.38 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26
23 2003 1634 117.8 -0.30 -1.04 0.974 49.8% -172 +107 -6 55.4% +0.24 5–3 (63%) 3–4 (43%) 102.5 +0.84 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97
24 2004 1626 110.3 -1.96 -2.43 0.757 44.1% -197 +83 -3 46.6% -0.70 5–4 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 104.2 -0.61 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86
25 2005 1485 107.8 -1.61 -0.97 0.841 46.2% -65 +131 +29 38.9% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.73 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08
26 2006 1531 105.8 — — — — — +134 — 60.0% +0.10 2–0 2–0 — +0.15 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20
Career — 1685 116.9 -1.35 -1.63 0.841 46.4% -86 +78 +33 44.9% -0.46 27–27 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.7 +0.60 — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.