H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ludmila Cervanova vs Rita Grande H2H: 0-2

Rita Grande holds a 2–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2001 Bratislava semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ludmila Cervanova
SVK Age 46 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #38 6-3 6-2 Ludmila Cervanova #115 Match data Oct 20, 2001* SF Bratislava Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rita Grande #42 6-2 6-4 Ludmila Cervanova #97 Match data Oct 12, 2001* R16 Shanghai Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ludmila Cervanova #889 #58 578 1,685 76 96 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Rita Grande
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0
18 1998 1–1 50.0% #135 1,508 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0
19 1999 5–9 35.7% #102 1,529 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0
20 2000 3–8 27.3% #122 1,490 0 0 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0
21 2001 11–16 40.7% #92 1,532 0 0 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0
22 2002 11–15 42.3% #103 1,541 0 0 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0
23 2003 20–14 58.8% #64 1,634 0 0 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0
24 2004 15–17 46.9% #96 1,625 0 0 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0
25 2005 7–15 31.8% #119 1,485 0 0 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0
26 2006 3–1 75.0% #325 1,531 0 0 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Rita Grande
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2004 1 6 7 14.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2006 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 30 40 25.0% 60 54 114 52.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ludmila Cervanova Rita Grande
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
18 1998 1509 99.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.01 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
19 1999 1529 121.2 — — — — — +52 — 36.4% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.02 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41
20 2000 1491 104.0 — — — — +16 +49 — 33.3% -1.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.44 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32
21 2001 1532 117.2 — — — — -10 -4 +111 42.4% -0.42 6–6 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 +0.10 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05
22 2002 1542 113.5 — — — — -69 +67 — 44.6% -0.39 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.38 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01
23 2003 1634 117.8 -0.30 -1.04 0.974 49.8% -172 +107 -6 55.4% +0.24 5–3 (63%) 3–4 (43%) 102.5 +0.84 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29
24 2004 1626 110.3 -1.96 -2.43 0.757 44.1% -197 +83 -3 46.6% -0.70 5–4 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 104.2 -0.61 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74
25 2005 1485 107.8 -1.61 -0.97 0.841 46.2% -65 +131 +29 38.9% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.73 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24
26 2006 1531 105.8 — — — — — +134 — 60.0% +0.10 2–0 2–0 — +0.15 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
Career — 1685 116.9 -1.35 -1.63 0.841 46.4% -86 +78 +33 44.9% -0.46 27–27 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.7 +0.60 — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.